The speed of development of assisted driving is almost geometric growth, used all good, and like the automatic overtaking, off-ramp of high-level assisted driving is really like hiring a driver, most cars will also be L2 level assisted driving standard to obtain passengers, access to channels become easy, but the use of thresholds and fault costs are low to no lower, emerging owners are showing off. A car with assisted driving drives itself when no one is in the driver’s seat, and netizens who see the video have no choice but to feel very angry, so is it necessary to standardize the guidelines for enabling assisted driving and the use of assisted driving?
Drivers who often watch evaluation videos understand that most of the current auxiliary driving relies on visual perception algorithms, and a small number of them can be combined with more powerful liDAR for perception, even if the current hardware is piled to the top, the recognition rate of various brands and the braking effect after recognition are uneven, not to mention the performance of complex road conditions such as rain and snow.
There was once a piece of news that made me thoroughly understand that assisted driving is just assistance. A young man who had just retired from the army honed his driving skills in the army, and when driving a Tesla Model S, assisted driving was enabled on the road, and it happened to be on the highway, and it happened to be isolated by a triangle drum. Unfortunately, the young driver did not focus on the road conditions. The Tesla Model S also did not recognize the stationary triangle bucket.
In the actual test, the main test link is basically pedestrian crossing, pedestrian stationary, vehicle stationary, slow in front of several scenes, and the test under these scenes, if the score can reach 60km/h it is the first echelon, 80km/h is rare, 90km/h almost no one to test, and the video in the driving position of no one those cars will be in how much speed? 100km/h, 120km/h.
When the vehicle starts auxiliary driving, when it detects that the driver’s hand is not held in the steering wheel or is not focused, it will be reminded, if there is no correction, there will be a louder reminder and slow braking, the way of detection is whether the steering wheel has a rotating force, whether to touch the steering wheel, with a camera detection, but there is a camera in the car all the time according to themselves who is uncomfortable, So most car companies choose the first two ways.
A sharp kitchen knife is a perfect tool in the hands of a chef, but it is a weapon in the hands of a hostage-taker. The tool or the weapon depends on who uses it. The car owner who regards auxiliary driving as a driverless vehicle and the bandit have the similar point of “playing with the lives of others”. There is always a way to overcome it, and making cheating the logic of enabling assisted driving a criminal law like drunk driving is obviously difficult to supervise.
At present, I think the best way is to establish the operating system of auxiliary driving, formulate the standardization of the safe use of auxiliary driving, and conduct training and examinations, so that the drivers who have passed can use it, and adopt the method of using the real name system of auxiliary driving to further regulate the behavior of users, after all, the foreign cases are “civilization is punished”.
Post time: Jul-31-2023